SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Gau) 174

N.CHAUDHURY
Jashkaran Ghorawat – Appellant
Versus
Dulal Mandal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. O.P. Bhati, Advocate.
For the Opp. Parties :Mr. S.P. Roy, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. O.P. Bhati, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.P. Roy, learned counsel for the opposite parties.

2. The petitioner herein as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No.492/2012 in the court of learned Munsiff No.2, Kamrup at Guwahati praying for a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from disconnecting of electricity and water to the tenanted premises along with other reliefs. The defendant landlord on being summoned appeared and filed written statement along with a counter-claim. The paragraph IX of the counter-claim was as follows :-

“IX. That the suit for declaration is valued at Rs.10,000/- and recovery of arrear electricity charges at Rs.3,663/- for the purpose of jurisdiction and Court fee and on both counts the separate ad valorem Court fee is paid.”

In the counter-claim the landlord prayed for a declaration that plaintiff is a defaulter in paying rent and that the tenanted premises was required bona fide by the defendants and so prayed for a decree of eviction of the plaintiff from the tenanted premises along with a prayer for realization of arrear electricity charges to the tune of Rs.3663/-.

3. The learned trial court accordingly





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top