RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Director, Central Bureau of Investigation – Appellant
Versus
Tarun Chandra Goswami – Respondent
All above petitions have been preferred against the impugned order dated 2.2.2015 passed by the learned Special Judge, CBI in Special Case No. 34 of 2006 wherein by invoking the provision of Section 319 Cr.P.C., the learned Court has newly added six accused persons in the said case namely, 1) Tshering Narbhog Bhutia, 2) Nava Kumar Hazarikia, 3) Subhod Chandra Rabha, 4) Muhiram Sonowal, 5) Promod Chandra Kalita and 6) Manabendra Chaudhury, holding that the aforesaid six persons shall also be tried together with the other accused already facing trial for the offences under Sections 120(b)/406/408/34 IPC and summoning them to face the trial in the aforesaid case.
2. Being aggrieved with the aforesaid order, the four newly impleaded accused persons namely, 1) Tshering Narbhog Bhutia, 2) Nava Kumar Hazarika, 3) Subhod Chandra Rabha, 4) Muhiram Sonowal have preferred the Criminal Petition No. 446/2015 .
One another newly impleaded accused Promod Chandra Kalita has preferred the Criminal Petition No. 526/2015.
The prosecution agency i.e. the Central Bureau of Investigation also challenged the impugned order by way of Criminal Revision Petition No. 186/2015.
As all the petitions have
Suresh Kumar Bhikamchand Jain vs. Pandey Ajay Bhushan and ors.
Saradjit Singh vs. State of Punjab
Prakash Singh Badal and Another vs. the State of Punjab and others
Paul Varghese vs. State of Kerala & another
Hardeep Singh vs. State of Punjab & ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.