SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Gau) 243

MANOJIT BHUYAN
ANISUZZAMAN LASKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. M.K. Choudhury, learned senior counsel representing the petitioner i.e. Anisuz Zaman Laskar, assisted by Mr. B. Chetri, Advocate. Also heard Mr. B. Chetri, learned senior Government Advocate, Assam. Mr. D. Bora appears on behalf of respondent no. 4. This order is only in respect of WP(C) 1022/2016.

2. Challenge is made to the Order dated 15.02.2016 whereby the petitioner was placed under suspension pending drawal of departmental proceeding. The said order was passed under the hand of the Additional Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Panchayat and Rural Development Department.

3. A two-fold challenge is made, in that, this was by way of a desperate step taken by the State Respondents when time and again the design of the respondents to transfer the petitioner from one place to another was frustrated at the intervention of this Court. Secondly, the said order of suspension dated 15.02.2016 was primarily at the behest of the respondent no. 4 who is the local MLA of 14, Borkhola Constituency, Assam.

4. Mr. M.K. Choudhury have referred to the various transfer orders to which the petitioner was subjected to as well as the orders passed by this Court in various writ p









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top