SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Gau) 377

A.K.GOSWAMI
Rejia Patir – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. M. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P.P. Barua, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 8 to 13 and Mr. T.C. Chutia, learned State counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7. None appears for respondent No. 5 despite service of notice.

2. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage.

3. Challenge in this writ petition is adoption of a resolution of no confidence against the petitioner who was the President of Ghilamara Anchalik Panchayat in a special meeting held on 27.7.2015. Eight members of the Anchalik Panchayat submitted a requisition on the subject of no confidence against the petitioner addressed to the Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur with a copy to, amongst others, the Block Development Officer and Ex-Officio Secretary of Ghilamara Anchalik Panchayat.

4. It is submitted by Mr. Choudhury that the requisition was not addressed to the petitioner and the said requisition was not placed before the President and therefore, she was not aware of the motion for no confidence. He, however, submits that though it appears from the record that a not














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top