MANOJIT BHUYAN
BIRENDRA RAJBANGSHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
Mr. N.K. Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. B.J. Talukdar, learned counsel representing respondent nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. Also heard Mr. C. Baruah, learned counsel representing respondent no. 5. Private Respondent No. 6 although represented, the learned counsel has not appeared today despite name being shown in the Cause List.
2. The short facts leading to the institution of this case is that the petitioner retired as Sub-Inspector from Assam Police on 31.01.2015 on attaining the age of superannuation. Although the petitioner had submitted all the papers facilitating payment of pension, however, the State Respondents have not initiated the processing of the pension papers. In this respect the petitioner had also submitted legal notice on 24.03.2015. As nothing was forth-coming, the petitioner is before this Court.
3. In the affidavit-in-opposition filed on behalf of respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4, stand taken is that the private respondent no. 6, being the wife of the petitioner but living separately, has instituted Title Suit No. 74/2013 before the Court of the Munsiff, Kamrup (M), Guwahati seeking declaration that she is the legally married wife of the petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.