HRISHIKESH ROY, PARAN KUMAR PHUKAN
PVR Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam, Represented by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Govt. – Respondent
Hrishikesh Roy, J.
Heard Dr. A. Saraf, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners in all the cases. Also heard Mr. D. Saikia, the learned Addl. Advocate General representing the respondents.
2. The petitioners operate multiplex/mini cinema halls and the issue here is their liability towards entertainment tax for the relevant period, under the Assam Amusement and Betting Tax Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as “the Assam Act?). The concerned entities, hereinafter referred to as “the Exhibitors” commenced commercial operation in Assam between 1.4.2007-1.2.2008 and therefore, by virtue of the Govt. Notification dated 29.3.2008 (Annexure-I), the exhibitors seek exemption from the liability to payment of tax, for a period of five years. The exemption notification was issued under Sub-Section (2) of Section 8 of the Assam Act. The petitioners in this batch of litigations can be divided in two groups. The first is the M/s. PVR Ltd. who have filed the WP(C) No.4477/2014, WP(C) No.4480/2014 and WP(C) No.4479/2014 and they claim that they have not collected the tax, whereas the 2nd group of M/s. Mridul Properties (P) Ltd., in the other five cases, have admittedl
Chatturam Holiram Ltd. Vs. CIT
Jay Vee Rice & General Mills vs. State of Haryana
M/s Pine Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Assessing Authority
State of Maharashtra vs. Swanstone Multiplex Cinema Private Ltd.
State of Karnataka vs. Drive-in-Enterprises
Mr. Saikia reads Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.