RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Khagen Chandra Nath, S/o Late Bhabi Ram Nath – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam, represented by the Public Prosecutor – Respondent
Rumi Kumari Phukan, J.
Heard Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. D. Borgohain, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No 2.
2. The instant revision petition under Section 397/401 r/w Section 482 CrPC is preferred by the petitioner, who is an accused in C.R. Case 535/2014 pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kamrup (M), Guwahati, that was filed by the respondent wife under Section 494/109 of IPC.
3. The facts necessary for disposal of the matter is that the present respondent being involved in a relationship with the petitioner for several years got married to him on 21.01.1987 and subsequently two daughters were born out of the marriage. Owing to marital dispute between the parties the respondents began to reside separately from the petitioner along with her daughters in the year 1995. Thereafter on 07.06.1995 the respondent wife filed a complaint case before the learned CJM, Darrang, Mangaldai, against the petitioner alleging inter-alia that the petitioner was untraceable since 21.05.1995 and then she come to know that the petitioner had married another women namely, Nirupama Devi and started to live as husban
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.