B.K.SHARMA
Deben Thaosen – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
B.K. Sharma, J. (Oral) - By means of this review petition, the petitioner has prayed for review of the Judgment & Order dated 26th June, 2013 passed in WP(C) No. 2515/2013. Be it stated here that the present petitioner was the writ petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of with the following order:-
"Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is directed against the communication dated 3.12.2012 by which the particular contract awarded to the petitioner was terminated invoking the clause 52.4 of the General Conditions of Contract (GCC). The petitioner is also aggrieved by the Annexure-24 NIT dated 26.2.2013. The said NIT was issued for completion of the balance work. In the mean time, the petitioner preferred an appeal under Clause 24.1 of the GCC for revocation of the impugned order of termination dated 3.12.2012. The said appeal was disposed of by Annexure-22 order dated 27.2.2013. By the said order, the appeal was dismissed upholding the impugned order dated 3.12.2012.
In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents it has been stated that the petitioner having invoked the alternative remedy by way of preferring the appeal against the termina
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.