P.K.SAIKIA, RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Tapan Mahanta – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
Rumi Kumari Phukan, J. - This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order 12.7.2011 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, FTC No.1 Kamrup at Guwahati in Sessions (K) No. 10(K)/2004 convicting the appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentencing him to suffer R.I. for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default further simple imprisonment for one year.
2. Criminal law was set into motion on the basis of the FIR so lodged by the informant namely Tarun Ch. Deka. The daughter of the said informant Smt. Anjana Deka was married to the accused Tapan Deka prior to four years from filing of the FIR and out of the said wedlock a female child was born to them, aged about 3 years at the time of occurrence. But their relationship was not good enough and on 20.3.2003 there was a quarrel between the two due to some personal affairs and that day at about 2 PM the informant received a phone call that his daughter Anjana has received burn injury and she was admitted at Down Town Hospital. Accordingly, the informant rushed to the hospital and found his daughter there with serious burn injuries on her person. He lodged FIR on the next day morning. A case was
Bikash & ors v. State of Maharashtra
Rajendra & ors v. State of Maharashtra
Chunni Lal v. State of U.P. reported in (2010) 7 SCC 496
Lakhan v. State of Maharashtra
Laxman v. State of Maharashtra
Mohar Singh and others v. State of Punjab
P.V.Radhakrishna v. State of Karnataka
Ram Kumar Pandey v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Rambai v. State of Chhattisgarh
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dal Singh and others
Samadhan Dhudaka Koli v. State of Maharashtra
Santosh Kumar Singh v. State through CBI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.