SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

UJJAL BHUYAN
Sukumar Talukdar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. P. Choudhury
For the Respondent: Mr. J. Roy, Mr. S. Borthakur, Mr. H. Gupta and P.N. Choudhury

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

Ujjal Bhuyan, J.

Heard Mr. P Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.J. Talukdar, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam. Also heard Mr. J Roy, learned counsel for respondent No.6, Mr. S Borthakur, learned counsel for respondent No.11, Mr. H Gupta, learned Central Govt. Counsel and Mr. PN Choudhury, learned Senior Retainer Counsel, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

2. None has appeared for respondent Nos. 7 to 10 despite service of notice.

3. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents, more particularly, respondent Nos.1 to 5 to hand over investigation of Dispur PS Case No.1786/2014, registered under sections 120B/306 IPC to the CBI for investigation.

4. Only essential facts necessary for disposal of the present writ petition are referred to hereunder.

5. Respondent No.7 is a co-educational school, situated at Darjeeling. It is stated that most of the students of the school are from Thailand and Bangladesh, though students from India are also present in significant numbers in the school. Petitioner's daughter, Debahuti Talukdar was enrolled in respondent No.7 school in Class-VIII
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top