SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MANOJIT BHUYAN
Sikha Das Gupta (Roy) – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. I.H. Saikia
For the Respondent: Mr. R. Mazumdar

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

Manojit Bhuyan, J.

Heard Mr. I.H. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioners in all the three writ petitions as well as Mr. R Mazumdar, learned senior standing counsel, Elementary Education Department. As all the three writ petitions raise a common issue with regard to stoppage of salary on and from February, 1997, the same are heard and disposed of by this common judgment.

2. The case laid out by the petitioners is that they were appointed as Assistant Teachers in various Lower Primary Schools in the District of Karimganj by appointment orders varying between the year 1995 and 1996, pursuant to advertisement and selection made by the Sub-Divisional Level Advisory Board for Elementary Education, Karimganj. The petitioners contend that they were appointed pursuant to Select List dated 22.06.1992 following the Advertisement of 1991 as well as pursuant to another Select List dated 18.08.1995 pursuant to Advertisement dated 1995. The particulars as to who amongst the petitioners were appointed pursuant to Advertisement dated 1991 and Advertisement dated 1995 have been indicated in the writ petitions. The said appointments were made against the posts created by the Go

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top