SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MANOJIT BHUYAN
Deepali Phukan – Appellant
Versus
Dibrugarh University – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: S.S. Dey, M. Nath, A. Bhattacharjee.
For the Respondents: N.C. Das, A. Das.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

Manojit Bhuyan, J.

Heard Mr. S.S. Dey, learned senior counsel representing the petitioner, assisted by Mr. M. Nath, Advocate. Also heard Mr. N.C. Das, learned senior counsel representing Dibrugarh University assisted by Mr. A. Das, Advocate.

2. At the outset it may be stated that Dibrugarh University have filed its affidavit-in-opposition and have also produced the relevant records, which have been perused by this Court.

3. This is the second time that the petitioner is before this Court challenging the action of the respondent authority in placing her under suspension pending disciplinary proceeding. On an earlier occasion WP(C) 5617/2014 was instituted challenging the Office Order dated 24.09.2014 issued under the hand of the Registrar, Dibrugarh University, Dibrugarh. The said order of suspension was interfered with and a direction was made for reinstating the petitioner in service. The said direction was made in view of the fact that the order of suspension had been passed in violation of Clause 32(i) of the Dibrugarh University Employees' Service Conditions Ordinance, 2000 (as amended upto May, 2007) read with section 18(p) of the University Act, 1965.

4. For a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top