SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

B.K.SHARMA, MANOJIT BHUYAN
Nabam Nikum – Appellant
Versus
State Of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

B.K. Sarma, J.

All the writ petitions involving the same issue have been taken up having heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common Judgment & Order.

2. While in WP(C) No.422/2013 the prayer made is to set aside and quash the Notification dated 8.6.2010 (Annexure-V), in other 4(four) Writ Petitions, the challenge is to orders passed by the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner on the appeals preferred by the petitioners against the decision of the Village Authority.

3. The issued falls for our consideration is as to whether by the impugned Notification dated 8.6.2010 of the Government of Arunachal Pradesh, all the Deputy Commissioners/Additional Commissioners could have been divested of their powers and jurisdiction to take up the trial of the cases, both civil and criminal including institution, till the Assam Frontier (Administration of Justice) Regulation, 1945 is suitably amended. Admittedly under the provisions of the said Regulation and depending upon the pecuniary jurisdiction, appeal lies to Deputy Commissioners/Additional Deputy Commissioners against the decision of the Village Authorities. An embargo has been created with the issuance of the


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top