SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Paran Kumar Phukan, J.
Md. Abdul Kuddush Sk. S/o Lt. Kaysar Ali Sheikh @ Kobsar Ali - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam and Anr. - Respondent
Crl. Pet. 189 of 2015
Decided On : 25-02-2016

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. M.A. Sheikh, Mr. K.U. Ahmed, Mr. M. Hossain and Ms. F. Intaz.
For the Respondent: Mr. A.T. Sarkar, Mr. B. Hussain and Mr. P.B. Mazumdar.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Sections 482, 200 , 202 , 156(1) and 155(2) - Quashing and setting aside the proceedings - Demanding dowry - Tortured her - Petition in brief is that petitioner and respondent No. 2 are legally married couple and marriage between them was solemnized in year 2000 as per Muslim custom - As a result of their co-habitation children were born and eldest son is aged about 14 years - For providing proper education to his children, petitioner who is a teacher of School, who was residing permanently with his family moved over to a rented house with his family, and started living there in a rented house - His wife left for her parental house at village-Satbil on pretext of giving some money to her brother and uncle and she was supposed to come back in evening - She did not come back to her house in evening and in enquiry, petitioner came to know from his father-in-law that his wife had not visited his house - In spite of his best efforts, petitioner could not ascertain her whereabouts and having no alternative, he filed an FIR with outpost - On basis of that FIR, G.D. entry No. 460 was made and I/C of outpost issued a police report to petitioner in this regard - Petitioner came to know from co-villagers that his wife had eloped with one and was staying with him in New Delhi - On getting this information, he lodged another FIR before police against his wife and which has been registered as Gossaigaon P.S. Case No.– Held, Learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate before taking cognizance ought to have examined her parents and other relatives and even her neighbours to ascertain truth - It is duty of court to ascertain that husband and his relatives are not harassed unnecessarily by wife by filing such concocted cases and all precautionary measures must be taken by Court before taking cognizance - In case in hand it is evident wife eloped with another person and lived with him for certain period in his wife which compelled her husband to file criminal cases against her - It is also evident as a retaliatory measure she filed complaint against her husband and his elder brother - Court as far as practicable before taking cognizance, should not only examine complainant but also other witnesses including her relatives to ensure whether any such offence has been committed by husband or his relatives - Filing of complaint by wife in instant case was a clear abuse of process of Court and by allowing trial to continue on the basis of such complaint would tantamount to denial of justice to the husband and his brother - Having heard the learned counsel appearing for parties and having regard to facts and circumstances and for all reasons as discussed above, I am of view that proceedings pertaining to Complaint Case No. is liable to be quashed in exercise of power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. which I accordingly do - All consequential orders arising out of aforesaid case are also quashed - Send down LCR along with a copy of judgment for information and necessary action – Ordered Accordingly

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

Paran Kumar Phukan, J.

This is an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing and setting aside the proceedings in C.R. Case No. 50c/2015 which is pending in the Court of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M), Gossaigaon.

2. The facts leading to the filing of the petition in brief is that the petitioner and the respondent No. 2 are the legally married couple and the marriage between them was solemnized in the year 2000 as per Muslim customs. As a result of their co-habitation, three children were born and the eldest son is aged about 14 years. For providing proper education to his children, the petitioner who is a teacher of Panijani Nepali Bathan L.P. School, Gossaigaon, who was residing permanently with his family at Rimijhimghat moved over to a rented house with his family to Saharghutu, a village situated near Rampur and started living there in a rented house. On 18.12.2014, his wife left for her parental house at village-Satbil on the pretext of giving some money to her brother and uncle and she was supposed to come back in the evening. But she did not come back to her house in the evening and in enquiry, the petitioner came to know from his father-in-law that his wife had not visited his house. In spite of his best efforts, the petitioner could not ascertain her whereabouts and having no alternative, he filed an FIR with the I/C, Simultapu outpost. On the basis of that FIR, G.D. entry No. 460 dated 19.12.2014 was made and the I/C of the outpost issued a police report to the petitioner in this regard. Subsequently, the petitioner came to know from the co-villagers that his wife had eloped with one Nur Alom Sheikh and was staying with him in New Delhi. On getting this information, he lodged another FIR before police on 02.01.2015 against his wife and Nur Alom Sheikh which has been registered as Gossaigaon P.S. Case No. 04/2015.

3. Soon thereafter, “a mel” was held in the village to discuss the matter where the father of said Nur Alom Sheikh was present and he gave a statement to the effect that his son Nur Alom Sheikh was missing from his house and he had come to know that he was staying in Delhi with the wife of the petitioner. A number of persons who were present in the “mel” put their signatures in the proceedings and the village headman also issued a certificate in this regard.

4. The petitioner having no other alternative divorced his wife and accordingly talaqenama was prepared and it was communicated to the respondent No. 2 by registered post.

5. The respondent No. 2 after about ½ months came back to the house of per parents and filed a complaint before the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gossaigaon alleging therein that she was tortured by the petitioner and his brother demanding dowry from her. On the basis of the complaint C.R. Case No. 50c/2015 has been registered and process was issued accordingly vide order dated 16.02.2015.

6. Being highly aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gossaigaon, the petitioner has preferred this petition for quashing of the proceedings of C.R. Case No. 50c/2015 and consequential orders passed in connection with the aforesaid case.

7. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the complaint case has been filed by the respondent No. 2 by suppressing material facts and the respondent No. 2 with a view to absolve herself from criminal liability has filed the false complaint against the petitioner and his brother which is liable to quashed.

8. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 2, on the other hand, submitted that due to mental and physical torture perpetrated by the petitioner and his brother, demanding dowry from her, she was compelled to file the complaint case against them. She denied that she eloped with Nur Alom Sheikh and stayed in Delhi with him.

9. Both the parties to the case filed affidavit in support of their respective cases. The petitione
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top