SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PARAN KUMAR PHUKAN
Kamal Hazarika – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:G.N. Sahewalla, A.K. Goswami, Md. Aslam, B. Sharma and A. Jalan, Advocates.
For the Respondent: B.J. Dutta.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

Paran Kumar Phukan, J.

1. Under assailment in this revision is the judgment and order dated 04.12.2004 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Tinsukia in Criminal Appeal No. 28(2)/2004 affirming the judgment and sentence dated 20.05.2004 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tinsukia in G.R. Case No. 133/1998 convicting the accused petitioner under Section 326 IPC and sentencing him to Rigorous Imprisonment for 1 (one) year and to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default, to Simple Imprisonment for 15 (fifteen) days.

2. The factual aspects of the case in a nutshell is that on the evening of 30.01.1998, while the injured Mrinmoy Choudhry was coming back to his house at about 9.30 pm along with the wife of the accused petitioner, Hemanti Hazarika at her request to escort her to her house and when he was taking betel nut offered to him by Hemanti Hazarika in her house, her husband (accused petitioner) arrived and inflicted dao blows to him on the lower part of his abdomen and pelvic region and other parts of his body causing grievious injuries to him. The injured was brought to his home by one Dusu a neighbour from the place of occurrence and thereaft



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top