IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
A.K.GOSWAMI, J.
Smti Ruma Bhuyan W/o Sri Sarat Ch. Bhuyan – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam, Represented by the Principal Secretary to the Government of Assam, Department of Home – Respondent
WP (C) No. 7363 of 2013
Decided On : 19-01-2017
Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Section 3(1) - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 2(30) – Vehicle - Vehicle got damaged totally - Claim for compensation for damage - Insured declared value of vehicle was Rs.4,04,478/- and certificate of insurance was valid from - After vehicle was requisitioned on same was sent to on with police personnel for election duty - Petitioner came to learn that vehicle was set ablaze at and petitioner in such circumstances approached authority vide letter dated to release vehicle and to make payment for requisitioned period - Categorical and positive stand of petitioner is that vehicle got damaged totally - It is stated that vehicle of petitioner was taken on hire in evening of on requisition - In affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No. 4 at Paragraph-5 it is categorically stated that vehicle of petitioner was requisitioned on for public purpose of conducting Panchayat Election, 2013 and said vehicle was sent to in District of Dhubri on with police personnel for maintaining law and order during Election - It is also admitted that requisitioned vehicle was set on fire by an unruly mob near Election Counting Hall on which resulted in said bus being completely damaged and beyond repair - On receipt of information from Superintendent of Police, , request was made to Superintendent of Police - Affidavit has stated that 2(two) requisitioned vehicles including one of petitioner were parked at College field premises - On at about 10:30 AM, some unknown miscreants armed with lathi, dao, etc by forming an unlawful assembly, entered into College field premises and set fire on vehicles and as a result of same vehicles were completed gutted – Held, Award of compensation in the exercise of jurisdiction in the domain of public law is based on application of doctrine of strict liability for contravention of fundamental right - In a given case, when it is established that there had been infringement of fundamental rights of a citizen and no other form of appropriate remedy in facts and circumstances is available Court to advance cause of justice can award compensation and may not relegate citizen to ordinary process of civil courts - Vehicle was damaged and burnt beyond repairs and petitioner cannot claim insurance from insurance company - Therefore, as vehicle was under control of State respondents, though not on basis of doctrine of strict liability but on principles of restitution State has to make good loss suffered by the petitioner - Court will not have to scout for material to quantify loss suffered by the petitioner - As value of vehicle was mentioned in Certificate of Insurance by petitioner herself same will have to be taken as value of the vehicle - In Certificate of Insurance, value of vehicle was indicated as and as the vehicle is completely damaged Court of considered opinion that amount mentioned in Certificate of Insurance, i.e. should be quantified as loss suffered by the petitioner - A writ of mandamus is issued to respondents directing them to make payment of aforesaid amount of Rs. 6,04,478/- to petitioner within a period of three months from today failing which aforesaid sum of will carry an interest at rate of 6%, per annum till amount is paid - Writ petition is allowed
1. Heard Mr. R.K. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T.C. Chutia, learned State counsel, appearing for all the respondents.
2. The petitioner had purchased a vehicle (Bus) bearing registration No. AS-01/X-8799 and the vehicle was plying passengers from Guwahati to Dhemaji. The year of manufacture of the vehicle was 2005 and the vehicle was under insurance with Reliance General Insurance Company Limited. The insured declared value of the vehicle was Rs.4,04,478/- and the certificate of insurance was valid from 19.07.2012 to 18.07.2013. After the vehicle was requisitioned on 06.02.2013, the same was sent to Dhubri on 09.02.2013 with police personnel for election duty. The petitioner came to learn that the vehicle was set ablaze at Hatsingimari, Dhubri and the petitioner in such circumstances approached the authority vide letter dated 18.02.2013 (Annexure-4 of the writ petition) to release the vehicle and to make payment for the requisitioned period. The categorical and positive stand of the petitioner is that the vehicle got damaged totally. The petitioner requested the Superintendent of Police, Sonitpur for returning the vehicle in good running condition or to pay the whole compensation for the damage caused to the vehicle vide representation dated 29.03.2013 (Annexure-5 of the writ petition). As no steps were taken by the authorities, the petitioner has filed the writ petition praying for the following reliefs:
“(i) to return the vehicle in good running condition as has been requisitioned by the authority;
(ii) to pay the whole purchase amount of the vehicle with the interest as applicable;
(iii) to pay the hired charges as due to the petitioner;
(iv) to pay compensation as entitled by the petitioner and/or after perusing the show causes if any records of the case and upon hearing the parties be pleased to make the Rule absolute and/or pass such other or further order/orders as Your Lordship may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
- AND -
It is prayed that pending disposal of this petition an appropriate interim direction may be issued directing the respondent authority to the effect that the monthly installment amount relates to the vehicle may be provided to the petitioner and/or be pleased to pass such further other orders as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper.”
3. In the affidavit filed by the respondent No. 3, it is stated that the vehicle of the petitioner was taken on hire in the evening of 06.02.2013 on requisition. In the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent No. 4, at Paragraph-5, it is categorically stated that the vehicle of the petitioner was requisitioned on 06.02.2013 for public purpose of conducting Panchayat Election, 2013 and the said vehicle was sent to Hatsingimari in the District of Dhubri on 09.02.2013 with police personnel for maintaining law and order during the Election. It is also admitted that the requisitioned vehicle was set on fire by an unruly mob near Hatsingimari Election Counting Hall on 15.02.2013, which resulted in the said bus being completely damaged and beyond repair. On receipt of information from the Superintendent of Police, Dhubri, request was made to the Superintendent of Police, Dhubri, to submit a detail report of the incident along with the MVI report of the damaged vehicle, which was still awaited. Information was given to the petitioner to take necessary steps from her end. It is also stated that as the detail report was not received from the Superintendent of Police, Dhubri, proposal for payment of adequate compensation could not be placed before the authority concerned.
4. The respondent No. 5, the Superintendent of Police, Dhubri in his affidavit has stated that 2(two) requisitioned vehicles including one of the petitioner were parked at Hatsingimari College field premises. On 15.02.2013 at about 10:30 AM, some unknown miscreants armed with lathi, dao, etc. by forming an unlawful assembly, entered into th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.