KALYAN RAI SURANA
Dipen Mitra – Appellant
Versus
On the death of Arbinda Kar, his legal heirs - Smt. Dulu Kar – Respondent
1. Heard Mr. B. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. U.K. Das, learned counsel for the respondents No. 1 & 2. None appears for the other respondents although service on them is complete.
2. The petitioner in this application has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is the judgment debtor in T. Ex. Case No. 15/2002, which was filed by Arabinda Kar (since deceased) to execute an ex-parte decree dated 26.03.2002, passed by the learned civil Judge, Nagaon in T.S. No. 51/2000. The order impugned herein is the order dated 01.03.2014, passed in the said execution case, on an application filed under section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The present respondents herein are the legal representatives of the original sole respondent i.e. Arabinda Kar.
3. Without referring to the case of the respondents herein in the suit, it would be sufficient to mention herein that the predecessor-in- interest of the substituted respondents had obtained an ex-parte decree as stated herein before. After the predecessor-in- interest of the petitioners came to know about the passing of the said ex-parte decree for his eviction from the suit pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.