SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Gau) 67

UJJAL BHUYAN
Mrinal Kumar Borah – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

This order will dispose of both WP(C) Nos.5441 and 5668/2015, as subject matter of the two writ petitions are inter-related and identical.

2. Both the writ petitions were heard on 19.01.2017 and today is fixed for delivery of judgment. Accordingly judgment is dictated in the open Court.

3. Heard Mr. P Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioner in WP(C) No.5441/2015, Mr. SK Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner in WP(C) No.5668/2015, Mr. B Kaushik, learned Standing Counsel, Higher Education Department, Govt. of Assam and Mr. SN Sarma, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Governing Body of Biswanath College. Also heard Mr. A Chamuah, learned Standing Counsel, University Grants Commission (UGC) and Mr. R Saloi, learned counsel for respondent No.6 in WP(C) No.5441/2015 (who is respondent No.7 in WP(C) No.5668/2015).

4. Matter relates to selection and appointment of Principal in the Biswanath College in the district of Sonitpur.

5. In WP(C) No.5441/2015, it is stated that an advertisement was published in the daily newspaper, “The Assam Tribune” on 07.12.2014 for the post of Principal in Biswanath College (College). Petitioner responded to the said advertisement. Howev













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top