SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Gau) 772

Gauhati High Court
B.D. Agarwal, J.
Liton Das - Appellant
Versus
State of Assam - Respondent
Crl. Pet. No.707 of 2013
Decided On : 17-09-2013

Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R. Dev.
For the Respondent: Mr. N.J. Dutta.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 87, 164 and 482 – Seeking quash of order - Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that non-bailable warrant of arrest was issued against petitioner on the very first day as the accused/petitioner was shown absconder in the charge sheet since it is not permissible under the law - Counsel further submitted that proclamation of attachment was issued even without any report from the concerned police station – Held, It is true that under section 87 of Cr.PC warrant of arrest can be issued in lieu of summons - However, in that situation, the Magistrate is required to record its reasons. Besides this, proclamation of attachment was issued without any report from the concerned police station that the accused is absconding. In this way the impugned orders are not in accordance with law - Impugned orders are set aside - Criminal petition is allowed.

1. This application under section 482, Cr.PC has been filed by the accused/ petitioner, namely, Sri Liton Das, praying for quashing of the various orders passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Nagaon in G.R. Case No. 2143/2011.

2. By these impugned orders the learned Magistrate has issued non-bailable warrant of arrest and proclamation of attachment against the petitioner.

3. Heard Mr. R. Dev, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N.J. Dutta, learned Addl P.P., Assam. Also perused the FIR, charge sheet, the victim's statement recorded under section 164, Cr.PC and the impugned orders.

4. Mr. Dey, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that non-bailable warrant of arrest was issued against the petitioner on the very first day as the accused/petitioner was shown absconder in the charge sheet since it is not permissible under the law. Learned counsel further submitted that proclamation of attachment was issued even without any report from the concerned police station.

5. It is true that under section 87 of the Cr.PC warrant of arrest can be issued in lieu of summons. However, in that situation, the Magistrate is required to record its reasons. Besides this, proclamation of attachment was issued without any report from the concerned police station that the accused is absconding. In this way the impugned orders are not in accordance with law. ,

6. Be that as it may, I have taken into consideration the fact that the victim was a 19 year old girl and as stated by the learned counsel the victim has married the petitioner.

7. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the criminal petition is allowed. The impugned orders are set aside.

8. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Nagaon within 10 days and pray for regular bail. On his surrender and filling appropriate application for bail, the same shall be considered in accordance with the observations made in this order.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top