SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Gau) 824

N.CHAUDHURY
Gunajit Pathak & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam & Anr – Respondent


For the Petitioners:Mr. J.C. Barman Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. B.S. Sinha, Addl. PP & Mr. S. Borthakur Advocates

N. Chaudhury, J --

1. Whether order dated 27.06.2013 passed by the learned SDJM(S), Dibrugarh, in CR Case No. 38C of 2013 taking cognizance under Sections 448/193/506/294/34 IPC is vitiated for not obtaining prior sanction as required under Section 197 of Cr.P.C. is the short question to be answered in this Criminal Petition.

2. One Vijay Pandey, a practising advocate of Dibrugarh Bar Association, lodged a complaint before the learned SDJM(S), Dibrugarh, stating that his mother Smt. Chintamoni Pandey is a patient of blood cancer of the last stage and undergoing treatment at Dibrugarh and Guwahati. His father late Anil Pandey was absolute owner in possession of a plot of land measuring 9 ft on the North -South and 84 ft in the East-West under Dag No. 171 and Periodic Patta No. 73. Said Anil Pandey got decree of the learned Civil Court with respect to the land on 21.03.1997 from the Court of learned Civil Judge -II (Junior Division), Dibrugarh, in Title Suit No. 9 of 1993 against one Smt. Lalmoni Pandey and others. The complainant further stated that apart from the said property, they have ancestral property at Chiring Chapari where they reside. On 28.06.2012 when his mother was out fo















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top