SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Gau) 649

AJIT SINGH, SUMAN SHYAM
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Riangdo Veneers PVT. LTD. – Respondent


Ajit Singh; CJ.:--

1. Mr. S Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant.

2. Heard on admission.

This appeal under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed against order dated 21.11.2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Guwahati Bench, whereby it has allowed respondent’s ITA No. 316/Gau/2013 for the Assessment Year 2009-2010.

3. The respondent had filed its return of Income for the assessment year 2009-2010. The Respondent claimed and received deduction of Rs. 54,28,812/- under Section 80IC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the profits and gains of business in respect of Transport Subsidy, Interest Subsidy, Fixed Deposit Interest, Miscellaneous Receipt and Central Excise Duty Refund. But the same was disallowed by the Assessing Officer vide order dated 16.11.2011. Aggrieved, the respondent preferred appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Shillong, who, vide order dated 25.3.2013 has partly allowed the same. Thereafter, the respondent filed appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Guwahati Bench, which has been allowed by the impugned order dated 21.11.2013. It is against this order, the Revenue has filed the present appeal.

4. It is not dispu


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top