SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Gau) 660

AJIT SINGH, SUMAN SHYAM
Nabam Metung & 16 Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh & 5 Ors. – Respondent


Ajit Singh; CJ.:--

1. Mr. T. Tony & Mr. B Arun, learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. Mr. B.D. Goswami, learned Additional Advocate General, Arunachal Pradesh for the respondents.

2. By this petition the petitioners have challenged the Gazette Notification dated 30.3.1989 issued under Section 4 (1) read with sub-section (1) and (4) of Section 17 of the Acquisition Act, 1894. By the said Notification, the State of Arunachal Pradesh proposed to acquire land described therein for the construction of Mental/ Psychiatric Hospital.

3. Admittedly, after the acquisition of land, Mental/ Psychiatric Hospital has already been constructed. It appears that the petitioners have encroached upon certain portion of the acquired land and since they are now being evicted, the present petition has been filed by them.

4. There is already an eviction order dated 19.04.2016/20.04.2016 passed against them by the Estate Officer. The petitioners have also filed an appeal against the eviction order before the appellate authority.

5. Whatever it may be, the land in question was acquired for construction of Mental/ Psychiatric Hospital pursuant to Gazette Notification dated 30.3.1989. The Notification was also pu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top