SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Gau) 770

Gauhati High Court
Nishitendu Chaudhury, J.
Leena Talukdar - Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.269 of 2006
Decided On : 10-09-2013

Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr. B.M. Choudhury
For the Respondent: Mr. P.N. Choudhury

Headnote:

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 374 – Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Sections 20, 27, 7 –Order of Conviction – This is an appeal under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with section 27 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – By this appeal, the appellant Smt. Leena Talukdar has challenged her conviction under section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act in Special Case of the Court of learned Special Judge, CBI Guwahati, Assam vide judgment and thereby sentencing her to suffer R.I. for 6 months and a fine of Rs. 1,000, in default to suffer S.I. for 1 month more – Held, Accused has not led any evidence from her side. – No attempt has been made in course of cross-examination of the prosecution witnesses to lay any foundation so as to explain the circumstances under which she was entitled to get money from the complainant. – Acceptance of money was proved beyond reasonable doubt. – Accused did not discharge its burden to rebut the presumption drawable against her under section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and the amount accepted being Rs. 10,000 cannot also be said to be a trivial one and accordingly, there is no escape from presumption under section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and as such, the learned trial court has not committed any error in convicting the accused/appellant under section 7 of the said Act – Appeal Dismissed

This is an appeal under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with section 27 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. By this appeal, the appellant Smt. Leena Talukdar has challenged her conviction under section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act in Special Case No. 18/2004 of the Court of learned Special Judge, CBI Guwahati, Assam vide judgment dated 9.11.2006 and thereby sentencing her to suffer R.I. for 6 months and a fine of Rs. 1,000, in default to suffer S.I. for 1 month more.

2. The prosecution story is that one Dudu Baruah a permanent resident of village Balisapara in the district of Jorhat lodged a written complaint with the Superintendent of Police, CBI, ACB at Guwahati on 27.11.2002 informing that Smt. Leena Talukdar who was an employee of NF Railway, Maligaon demanded Rs. 60,000 from him for arranging a job of LDC in the said office for which the informant had submitted his candidature and also appeared in the interview. Allegedly, the said Leena Talukdar demanded Rs. 10,000 being the first installment.

3. Upon receipt of the said complaint, the SP engaged one Bhagwan Das, Inspector of CBI, ACB, Guwahati to verify the genuineness of the complaint who made an enquiry and then reported that the complaint was genuine. At this stage, it was decided to lay trap to nab the employee red-handed. One Manoj Banerjee another Inspector of CBI, ACB, Guwahati was entrusted with the job to lay the trap. Shri Banerjee requisitioned, Smt. Sipra Sarkar and Shri Ramendu Nath Das both Assistants Grade-II in the office of FCI at Guwahati on 27.11.2002 and a pre-trap demonstration was held with them. Powder of phenolepthalein was sprinkled on some paper and thereafter Sri R.N. Das, one of the two witnesses requisitioned from FCI was asked to put his hand thereon and thereafter to put his hand aqueous solution of sodium carbonate and thereupon the water turned pink. The demonstration was given to these witnesses only to acquaint them with the process of laying trap. Thereafter, 5 notes of five hundred rupees and 75 notes of hundred rupees denomination thus valuing rupees ten thousand in total was similarly sprinkled with phenolpthalein powder and then given to the complainant to put in his pocket for giving to the accused on demand . A pre-trap memorandum was prepared with all details of currency notes. Then, the whole party consisting of Shri Dudu Baruah, the aforesaid two witnesses, Shri Bhagwan Das and Shri Manoj Banerjee both Inspectors of CBI, ACB, Guwahati proceeded towards the NF Railway Office at Maligaon where the complainant brought the accused Leena Talukdar talked to her and thereafter both Dudu Baruah and Smt. Leena Talukdar proceeded to canteen. In the canteen, the accused demanded the money to the complainant who accordingly made payment of the aforesaid packet of ten thousand rupees and then gave signal to the trap party. The episode was seen by witness Sipra Sarkar and Manoj Banerjee, the Trap Laying Officer (TLO) who then disclosed his identity to the accused and thereupon the Smt. Leena Talukdar immediately threw away the money on the floor. The TLO seized the currency notes and then she was asked to put her hand in the water containing sodium bicarbonate which immediately turned pink. Thereafter, as provided under the law, post trap memorandum was prepared and seizure of the notes as well as the solution was made. The TLO was thereafter appointed as IO who completed the investigation and then submitted charge sheet against Smt. Leena Talukdar under sections 17 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 to stand for trial.

4. The learned court below framed charge against the accused under the aforesaid sections as follows :

"First, that during 2002-03 while you were functioning and working as Head clerk at the office of the Chief Commercial Manager (Rates), N.F. Railway Maligaon, Guwahati, a public servant and in such capacity, you demanded Rs. 60,000 from complainant Sh
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top