INDIRA SHAH
Techi Hitlar and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh and Ors. – Respondent
Heard Mr. S.S. Dey, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Ms. Geeta Deka, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of State Respondents No. 1 to 4, as well as Mr. P.K. Tiwari, learned counsel, assisted by Mr. S. Mili, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of private Respondent No. 5.
2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioners are challenging the appointment of Respondent No. 5 to various offices who was originally appointed as an Assistant Engineer under the Public Works Department in the State of Arunachal Pradesh on Ad-hoc basis and whose services was regularized in the grade of Assistant Engineer (Civil) in the same Department. The Respondent No. 5, thus, holds a substantive post of Assistant Engineer under the Public Works Department.
3. Vide order dated 26.03.2007, issued by the Secretary, Urban Development & Housing, Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar, the Respondent No. 5 was appointed on officiating capacity as Deputy Director in the pay scale of Rs. 10,000-15,200/- in the Department of UD & Housing, Amnachal Pradesh. Again vide order dated 07.07.2008, the Respondent No. 5 was appointed as an E
AIR 1965 SC 491 University of Mysore Vs. C.D. Govinda Rao [Para 12]
(1977) 1 SCC 271 State of Haryana Vs. The Haryana Cooperative Transport Ltd. [Para 15]
(1993) 2 SCC 703 Dr. Kashinath G Jalmi & anr. Vs. The Speaker & Ors. [Para 15]
(2006) 2 SCC 482 Union Public Service Commission Vs. Girish Jayantilal Vaghela & Ors. [Para 15]
(2007) 4 SCC 54 Ashok Kr. Sonar Vs. Union of India & Ors. [Para 15]
(2013) 1 SCC 501 Rajesh Awasthi Vs. Nandlal Jaiswal & Ors. [Para 9
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.