SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Gau) 1217

INDIRA SHAH
Ha Tadok – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr. Tony Pertin.
For the Respondent: Mr. K.Tado

1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 3.11.2014 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, West Sessions Division, Yupia, in Session Case No. 106/2010 whereby the appellant has been convicted under section 304 Part-I IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years with fine of Rs.5,000, in default, further rigorous imprisonment for 5 months.

2. I have heard Mr. Tony Pertin, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. K. Tado, learned P.P., appearing on behalf of the State of Arunachal Pradesh.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 13.6.2007, the accused appellant Ha Tadok assaulted the deceased Jogesh Dolley inflicting knife blows causing severe injuries in his stomach. An FIR being lodged by the victim himself, the Officer-ih-charge of the Ziro Police Station, registered a case under section 326 IPC. Immediately police rushed to the district hospital at Ziro where the victim was admitted for treatment. The statement of the victim and other witnesses available there were recorded. On the basis of the FIR as well as the statement of the witnesses including the victim, the accused appellant was arrested. The victim was referred to the Nahar


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top