SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Gau) 1280

L.S.JAMIR
Lalengvara – Appellant
Versus
Laldawangliana Sailo and Anr. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr. Zochhuana and Mr. Lalchhanliana Khangte
For the Respondents: Mr. Saurab Pradhan.

1. Heard Mr. Zochhuana learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. S. Pradhan for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. Lalfakawma for the respondent No. 2.

2. The present appeal filed under section 173 of the MV Act, 1988 is directed against the judgment and award dated 27.2.2012, passed by the learned MACT, Aizawl, Mizoram in MACT Case No. 56 of 2007.

3. The brief facts, leading to filing of this appeal is that on 31.7.2006, a motor bike bearing Regd. No. MZ-01/C-9180, driven by the respondent No1/claimant and one Taxi bearing Regd. No. MZ-01/C-5415 belonging to the appellant/opposite party No. 1 collided with each other. As a result, the respondent No.1/claimant sustained permanent disablement of 20%. The respondent No.1/claimant, therefore, filed claim petition under section 166 of the M.V Act, 1988 being MACT Case No. 56/2007 before the MACT Aizawl, Mizoram.

4. The learned MACT, Aizawl, Mizoram by Judgment and Award dated 27.2.2012 disposed of the said claim petition by directing the appellant/ opposite part No.1 to pay a sum of Rs. 1,41,819 along with interest to the respondent No. 1/claimant. Being aggrieved, this present appeal has been filed by the appellant/opposite part No.1.

5.





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top