C.R.SARMA
Pronab Baruah – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam and Ors. – Respondent
2. Aggrieved by the said order and the proceeding in Complaint case No. 14/2013, the petitioner aforesaid has come up with this quashing proceeding on the ground that jurisdiction under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. could not have been exercised, without obtaining prior sanction under Section 19(3) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter called the P.C. Act.), inasmuch as, the petitioner (accused person) was a public servant.
3. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for both the parties. It is submitted that the present case is covered by order dated 13.05
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.