UJJAL BHUYAN
Sunil Kumar Shahi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & 3 Ors – Respondent
This order will dispose of the above bunch of cases.
2. Subject matter of all the writ petitions being identical, those were clubbed and heard together.
3. Heard Mr. R Mazumdar, Mr. TN Srinivasan, Mr. B Pathak and Mrs. S Bora, learned counsel for the petitioners and a host of learned Central Govt. Counsel, namely, Mr. M Phukan, Mrs. A Gayan, Ms. B Sarma, Mr. SS Roy, Mr. KK Parasar, Ms. R Devi and Ms. A Das. In course of the hearing, Mr. SC Keyal, learned Assistant Solicitor General had also made submissions.
4. Matter relates to premature retirement of personnel belonging to the Assam Rifles.
5. For the sake of convenience, pleadings made in WP(C) No.1250/2015 are being referred to. In fact, Mr. SC Keyal, learned Assistant Solicitor General had submitted on 06.05.2016, as recorded in the order sheet of WP(C) No.1250/2015, that counter-affidavit filed by the respondents in WP(C) No.1250/2015 may be treated as the lead affidavit covering all the cases.
6. Petitioner in WP(C) No.1250/2015 (referred to as the petitioner hereinafter) had joined service in the Assam Rifles as Rifleman/Nursing Assistant on 04.03.1985. In the course of his service, he had risen through the ra
Abdul Ghani v. State of Jammu & Kashmir
Baikuntha Nath Das v. Chief District Medical Officer, Baripada
Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Subhash & Co.
Gur Pratap Singh Bedi v. State of Punjab
Jugal Chandra Saikia v. State of Assam
Mayengbam Radhamohan Singh v. Chief Commissioner (Administrator) Manipur
Union of India v. Chandra Mohan Nigam
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.