P.K.SAIKIA, M.R.PATHAK
Chandan Debnath – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
2. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the aforesaid judgment, the accused person has preferred this appeal citing several infirmities in the judgment under challenge.
3. We have heard Mr. A. Thakur, learned counsel assisted by Mr. H.J. Das, learned counsel for the appellant and also heard Ms. S. Jahan, learned Addl. P.P., for the State.
4. The case, projected by the prosecution in the FIR dated 24.09.2008 and in subsequent trial, in short, is that the accused person married one Monika Debnath (since deceased) about 8 (eight) years ago prior to the date of incident. Out of their wed-lock, 2 (two) daughters were born to them. However, sometime after the marriage, the relationship between the accused and the deceased started deteriorating.
5. Only few da
Govindaraju @ Govinda v. State by Sriramapuram P.S.
Paniben (Smti) v. State of Gujarat
Ram Chandra Reddy v. Public Prosecutor
Ramavati Devi v. State of Bihar
Rasheed Beg v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Shyamal Ghosh v. State of West Bengal
State of M.P. v. Ram Sagar Yadav
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.