SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Gau) 1162

Gauhati High Court
Nishitendu Chaudhury, J.
Mega Electricals , Joint Venture & Ors. - Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 5950 of 2014
Decided On : 23-03-2015

For the Petitioners:- N. Dutta, S. Sarma, NNB Choudhary, B. Padun, M.P. Chaudhury and D.P. Sahu, Advocates.
For the Respondents:- Dr. G. Lal, J.D. Khaund, ANI Hussain, U. Sarma, R. Begum, T. Buragohain, P.K. Talukdar and K.R. Pargiri, Advocates.

Headnote:

Writ Petition - Education - Settlement of a contract work involving construction - Award the contract in favour of respondent - Claiming to be the lowest bidder in the tender process has challenged this resolution - While issuing notice of motion, this court passed an interim order permitting the official respondents to proceed with the selection procedure but not to issue work order - By filing an affidavit-in-opposition, the official respondents have brought on record that the selection procedure has been over and the Board accepted re-commendation – Held, Writ court examines the decision-making process and not correctness of decision - Purpose is to see whether a proper and fair procedure was adopted by the executive to arrive at a decision - A decision-making process can be said to be fair, if it reasonably appears to be full-proof from potential manipulation - Dutta Associates required state machinery to divulge the rule of the game at the first instance only to ensure that no loop whole is left for possible manipulation of a decision - Whether decision has been really manipulated in the instant case is not under consideration as no malice has been attributed - But what has been pointed out is that after the techno-commercial bids were examined and technically fit tenderers were singled out, an exercise of excluding some technically fit bidders by applying amended procurement guidelines has been made and as per the terms of the NIT or the general conditions procurement guidelines were never disclosed to be applicable - So, the participants have been prejudiced - If a new term or condition is permitted to be applied at such stage, then always there shall be a scope to favour a blue eyed contractor - This is how disclosure of the procedure at the time of issuance of NIT constitutes a precondition for fairness in matters involving distribution of state largesse - Petition allowed.

Nishitendu Chaudhury, J. –

Pursuant to notice inviting tender dated 31.7.2014 for settlement of a contract work involving construction of 33 KV line under Kalain Electrical Sub-Division of Cachar Electrical Circle, the Tender Purchase Committee of the APDCL(hereinafter referred to as 'the TPC') adopted resolution on 13.11.2014 to award the contract in favour of respondent No.10, M/S Jayanta Khound Joint Venture with Win Power Pvt. Ltd. Writ petitioner claiming to be the lowest bidder in the tender process has challenged this resolution by filing present writ petition. On 21.11.2014 while issuing notice of motion, this court passed an interim order permitting the official respondents to proceed with the selection procedure but not to issue work order. By filing an affidavit-in-opposition, the official respondents have brought on record that the selection procedure has been over and the Board accepted re-commendation of the TPC on 20.12.2014. The writ petitioner, therefore, filed an application praying for amendment of the writ petition so as to challenge the decision of the Board taken on 20.12.2014 whereby impugned resolution of the TPC was approved. The amendment was allowed after hearing both sides and thereafter the main writ petition has been taken up for hearing. The writ petition, therefore, requires adjudication as to legality and validity of not only the resolution dated 13.11.2014 adopted by the Tender Purchase Committee but also the decision of the board adopted on 20.12.2014 accepting the recommendation.

2. The writ petitioner is a joint venture of three units, namely, Mega Electrical, Dihang Edu-tech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd and Borooah Real Estates and Commercial Pvt. Ltd. The writ petitioner along with six others participated in the tender process initiated by Notice Inviting Tender (herein after referred to as "NIT") dated 13.7.2014. By that NIT, sealed tenders were invited from experienced and financially sound electrical contractors (individual or joint venture or firms having valid electrical contractor license upto 33 KV issued by the competent authority of the Government of Assam, interalia, for construction of 33 KV line, augmentation of 33/11 KV S/S construction on power railway track crossing of 33 KV line under Kalain Electrical Sub-Division of Cachar Electrical Circle for providing service connection to flood light installation along India Bangladesh border in Assam. The NIT has been annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition. The NIT shows that the tender paper can be purchased in all working days upto 4 pm w.e.f.4.8.2014 to 12.8.2014 from the office of the Chief General Manager (D), APDCL, CAR, Bijulee Bhawan, Paltan Bazar and can also downloaded from the official website within the same period. Date of submission of tender has been shown as 1300 hrs. of 22.8.2014. The date of opening of techno commercial bid is at 1330 hrs. on 22.8.2014 and price bid would be opened on a date to be notified later on. Clause-3 of the NIT shows that bids must be in two parts as techno commercial bid and price bid in two separate envelops superscribing (a) tender number (b) name of bidder with full address and (c) name of the package against which the bid is offered. In Clause-10 it was further mentioned that only those bidders whose part-I bid i.e. techno commercial bid is found acceptable, shall be considered for opening of the price bid, the date and time for which would be communicated to the eligible bidders in due course. It was mentioned that details can be seen in the official website of the APDCL which is www.apdcl.gov.in. The terms and conditions of the NIT are mentioned in separate sheet. As per recital of Clause-4 thereof, techno commercial bid will include defined vendors, scope of work, responsibilities, guarantees, specification of equipment, commercial terms and conditions, vendor's company credentials, experience of similar assignment, registration details etc. and the format for techno commercial bid is































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top