SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Gau) 355

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
A.K.GOSWAMI & PARAN KUMAR PHUKAN, JJ.
Sri. Bikash Chowdhury, Son of Sri Munindra Chawdhury – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam and Ors. – Respondents
CRIMINAL APPEAL (J) No. 64 to 68 OF 2014 and CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 233, 268, 271, 238 OF 2014, 37 OF 2015
Decided On : 04-05-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. N.N.B. Choudhury, Amicus Curiae
For the Respondents: Ms. S. Jahan, Addl. PP, Assam

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections Section 302, 149, 143, 148 and 427 - Offence of murder - Criminal Trial - Conviction and sentence - Appeals are directed against the judgment and sentence - Held, On careful scrutiny of the evidence, we have found that the eye witnesses PW 4 and PW 12 have given a consistent account of the incident and they not only saw the appellants named by them but also attributed overt act to some of them - They have stood satisfactorily in cross examination and defence virtually could not elicit anything from them while cross examining them - Evidence of these 2 witnesses mostly remained unshaken and inspire confidence - Court does not find any reason to discredit their evidence even though they are relatives of the deceased and inimical towards the appellants - Had there been any intention on their part to rope in all the appellants, they could have done so by attributing overt act to all of them but they have not do so - Moreover, they would not shield the real culprits involved in the commission of the crime - Appeals allowed

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

P.K. Phukan, J.

These appeals are directed against the judgment and sentence dated 06.06.2014, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh in Sessions Case No.128/2005 convicting the accused appellants u/s 143/148/427/302 of the IPC read with section 149 of the IPC and sentencing them to Rigorous Imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.2000/- each under Section 302/149 of the IPC and Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 months under Section 143/148/427 of the IPC.

2. This is a case of brutal murder of 3 brothers of the same family. The deceased persons namely, Dilip Konwar, Tapan Konwar and Rajib Konwar were the sons of Mouzadar of No.2 Ghurania Gaon village situated at Naharkatia under Tingkhong Police Station in Dibrugarh district and all of them were living together in the same house with their father. The other 3 brothers, namely, Bhaskar Konwar, Sourabh Konwar and Pradip Konwar were living separately. Residence of Bhaskar Konwar and Pradip Konwar is situated at a little distance away from the residence of the deceased persons and Sourabh Knowar was residing in the same campus with that of the deceased but in a separate house.

3. The case as projected by prosecution is that on the evening of 14.04.2003 at about 7.30 p.m. the accused Sanjeet @ Papi had some quarrel with Rajib Konwar in front of the house of Bhaskar Konwar. On the next day i.e., on the day of Rongali Bihu on 15.04.2003 the accused appellants and other charge sheeted accused armed with deadly weapons like dao, lathi, axe etc., at about 11.30-12.00 noon entered into the campus of the house of Bhaskar Konwar. On seeing the unruly mob approaching the house, apprehending danger to his life, he took shelter within the four walls of his house by bolting the doors and windows and locking the gates and grills. The appellants entered into his campus and being unable to find him, vandalized some of his properties outside the house and also set fire to his Ambassador car which was parked outside and thereafter, they left that place. On getting the information when his brother Dilip, Rajib and Tapan came towards his house for his rescue, all the accused accosted them on the Naharkatia Road and mounted a joint assault on them with weapons in their hands which resulted in their instantaneous death.

4. On getting the information from one Babu Konwar, police from Tingkhong Police Station immediately proceeded to the spot after making a GD Entry No. 250 dated 15.04.2003 and on arrival, found 3 dead bodies lying at the place of occurrence at Parbatipur Tiniali. Police held inquest on the dead bodies and thereafter, sent the bodies for post mortem examination and also recorded statement of some witnesses. In the evening at about 7.30 p.m. Bhaskar Konwar lodged a written FIR regarding the incident on the basis of which Tingkhong P.S. Case No.40/2003 was registered and after completion of investigation submitted charge sheet against the accused appellants and some others u/s 143/147/148/149/447/427/302 of the IPC.

5. In order to prove the charges the prosecution examined as many as 33 witnesses including the officials. The defence pleaded innocence and in support of their case examined 5 witnesses.

6. The learned Sessions Judge upon consideration of the entire evidence on record found the accused appellants and other accused guilty and convicted and sentenced them accordingly as stated above. Being highly aggrieved, the accused appellants have preferred these appeals.

7. We have heard Ms. T. Som learned counsel appearing for the appellant in Crl. A. 37/2015, and Crl. A. No.233/2014, Mr. B. N. Gogoi, learned Amicus Curiae in Crl. A.(J) No. 64/2014, Crl.A.(J) No.65/2014 and Crl. A. (J) No.66/2014, Mr. N. N. B. Choudhury, learned Amicus Curiae in Crl.A.(J) No.68/2014, Mr. N. J. Das, learned counsel for the appellants in Crl. A. No. 238/2014, Mr. T. J. Mahanta, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant in Crl.A.268/2014 and Mr. P. Sharma, learned counsel appearin











































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top