KALYAN RAI SURANA
Anurupa Roy (Rupa) – Appellant
Versus
Ajit Lal Kar – Respondent
1. This matter has been taken up for hearing at the admission stage. I have heard Mr. T. Roy, the learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. B. Sarma, the learned Counsel for the respondent.
2. The order dated 02.11.2016 passed by the learned Munsiff No. 1, Cachar, Silchar, in T.S. No. 61/2011 is impugned in this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, by which the petition filed by the petitioners/defendants under section 30 read with section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code to call for the records and to order production of two registered deeds from the Sub-Registry, Cachar, was rejected.
3. Owing to the nature of reliefs as sought for in this revision, it is not deemed necessary to burden this judgment with the respective pleadings of the parties.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that on 02.11.2016, which was the date fixed for filing of evidence-on-affidavit by the defendants, the petitioners filed a petition under section 30 read with section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code containing the prayer to pass an order to call for the two registered deeds from the Sub-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.