SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Gau) 420

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
Raj Traders – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Respondent:Mr. S.P. Choudhury, Advocate

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

1. None appears for the petitioner, when the matter is called upon. Mr. S.P. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for all the respondents.

2. The petitioner was placed with certain orders by the Superintendent of Police (City) Guwahati, for supply of spare parts and accessories for the official vehicles. The said supply orders are as Annexure A series to the writ petition. One such supply order is at Page- 11 of the writ petition dated 03.06.99 addressed to the petitioner for supply of one meter rexin, seat clip for the vehicle No. AS-30/0472. By another supply order dated 12.06.1998, the petitioner was placed with the order for supply of 13 meter hood cloth, one meter rexin and some such items for the vehicle AS-30/0342 Jeep.

3. The supply orders were under the signature of one Mrinal Das in respect of vehicle AS-30/0472 and one Gunaram Gogoi in respect of vehicle No. AS-30/0342. Similarly other supply orders are also available and annexed to the writ petition.

4. The petitioners state that pursuant to the said supply orders, the petitioners had made the required supply and the respondents had received the same. Subsequently thereto, the petitioners submitted certai









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top