Ajit Singh, J.

Having noticed divergence of views expressed by the Supreme Court of India in the cases of U.P. State Road Transport corporation Vs. Trilok Chandra, (1996) 4 SCC 362, New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Charlie, (2005) 10 SCC 720, New India Assurance Company Vs. Smt. Shanti Pathak, (2007) 10 SCC 1, Ramesh Singh Vs. Satbir Singh, (2008) ACJ 814, Sarala Verma (Smt.) Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation (2009) 6 SCC 121, National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Shyam Singh, (2011) 7 SCC 65, Amrit Bhanu Shali Vs. National Insurance Company Limited, 2012 ACJ 2002, Reshma Kumari Vs. Madan Mohan, (2013) 9 SCC 65, Munna Lal Jain Vs. Vipin Kumar Sharma, (2015) 6 SCC 347 and Single Bench decisions of this High Court in Sh. Laldaihzauva Vs. Lalnunsangi, (2016) 4 GLR 708, New India Assurance Company Vs. Bhuban Chandra Bora, 2016 (5) GLJ 21, Oriental Insurance Company Vs. Shitamai Saikia, 2016 (2) GLT 653 and National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Keteki Barua, 2014 (4) GLT 531, the learned Single Judge has referred the following question for our consideration:- Whether age of the parents is relevant in choosing multiplier when claim petition is filed by the parents for dea