SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Gau) 649

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, J.
Dr. (Mrs) Akani Das and others – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam and others - Respondents
WP(C) No.472 of 2014
Decided on : 21-07-2017

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. B. Chakraborty, Adv
For the Respondents: Mr. S.S. Roy, State Counsel, Mr. P.D. Nair, Adv Mr. Y.S. Mannan, Adv

Headnote:

Writ petition – Service - Hazardous Radiations - Telecom Infrastructure - Petitioners are aggrieved by the installation of a mobile phone tower over the premises of the respondent No9 and accordingly seek for a direction to the respondent authorities to remove the said mobile phone tower –Held, While conducting its hearing, the Committee shall give a personal hearing to the petitioner and their representatives as well as the respondent Nos 8 and 9 for arriving at a proper decision and shall allow the petitioner as well as the respondents to produce all relevant materials that they may desire to produce before the Committee to enable the Committee to arrive at its proper adjudication - Committee upon conclusion of its enquiry, shall pass a reasoned order thereon within a period of months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order - Petition disposed of

JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL) :

Heard Mr. B. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. P.D Nair, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.8, Mr. Y.S Mannan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and Mr. S.S Roy, learned State Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 5.

2. In this writ petition, the petitioners are aggrieved by the installation of a mobile phone tower over the premises of the respondent No.9 and accordingly seek for a direction to the respondent authorities to remove the said mobile phone tower.

3. It is the case of the petitioners that firstly the said mobile phone tower is located in a congested residential area and emitting certain radiations which are harmful and hazardous to the people, who lives in the area. Further it is also the case of the petitioner that the mobile phone tower had been installed on the premises of the respondent No.9 over the roof of a four storied building, where permission from the concerned Municipal authorities had been obtained for G+2 level i.e. for three stories.

4. Mr. P.D Nair, learned counsel for the respondent No.8 on the other hand takes a stand it is actually not a four storied building, but it is over the stair case of the building, which from outside appears to look like a four storied building.

5. Mr. B. Chakaborty, learned counsel for the petitioner also raises an assertion that sound pollution is also being emitted due to the operation of the mobile phone tower.

6. Mr. Y.S Mannan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent PWD has produced an order dated 11.08.2015 of the Deputy Secretary to the Government of Assam, Information and Technology Department, wherein certain modifications to the guidelines pertaining to clearance and permit for installation of mobile towers in Assam and disposal of pubic grievances in that regard had been made. As per the said revised guidelines, two committees are to be constituted by the Government of Assam being the District Level Committee and State Level Committee for dealing with the matters related to public grievance as regards installation of mobile towers and other issues related to telecom infrastructure in the State of Assam. The composition of the District Telecom Committee and the State Telecom Committee is as follows:-

“District Telecom Committee (DTC):

The DTC will comprise of the members as mentioned below. However, the Chairman of DTC is authorized to co-opt any expert or official as necessitated.    

i. Deputy Commissioner

Chairman

ii. Superintendent of Police

Member

iii. TERM Cell representative

Member

iv. Commissioner/Executive Officer/Chairman/ of all ULBs of the district

Member

v. CEO Zila Parishad/Principal Secretary of the 6th Scheduled Council

Member

vi. One representative of the Pollution Control Board

Member

vii. Joint Director of Health Services

Member

viii. Executive Engineer, PWD(Bldg)

Member

ix. Executive Engineer PWD (Rural Road

Member

x. District Head of BSNL

Member

xi. District head of each Telecom/Infrastructure Service Provider

Member

xii. Additional Deputy Commissioner (Magistracy)

Member-Convener

State Telecom Committee (STC): The STC will comprise of the following members. However, the Chairman of STC is authorized to co-opt any expert or official as necessitated.    

i. Chief Secretary

Chairman

ii. Additional Chief Secretary Information Technology Deptt

Vice Chairman

iii. Senior most Secretary, Home Department

Member

iv. Senior most Secretary, GAD

Member

v. Senior most Secretary, Health Department

Member

vi. Senior most Secretary, PWD

Member

vii. Senior most Secretary, P&RD

Member

viii. Senior most Secretary, Reven







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top