SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Gau) 649

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
Akani Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. B. Chakraborty, Adv
For the Respondents: Mr. S.S. Roy, State Counsel, Mr. P.D. Nair, Adv Mr. Y.S. Mannan, Adv

JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL) :

Heard Mr. B. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. P.D Nair, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.8, Mr. Y.S Mannan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and Mr. S.S Roy, learned State Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 5.

2. In this writ petition, the petitioners are aggrieved by the installation of a mobile phone tower over the premises of the respondent No.9 and accordingly seek for a direction to the respondent authorities to remove the said mobile phone tower.

3. It is the case of the petitioners that firstly the said mobile phone tower is located in a congested residential area and emitting certain radiations which are harmful and hazardous to the people, who lives in the area. Further it is also the case of the petitioner that the mobile phone tower had been installed on the premises of the respondent No.9 over the roof of a four storied building, where permission from the concerned Municipal authorities had been obtained for G+2 level i.e. for three stories.

4. Mr. P.D Nair, learned










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top