SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Gau) 790

AJIT BORTH AKUR
Tana Hari – Appellant
Versus
Nabam Takam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Hage Lampu
For the Respondent: Mr. Ninnong Ratan

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

Ajit Borthakur, J.

Heard Mr. Hage Lampu, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Ninnong Ratan. learned counsel for Respondent No. 1.

2. This is a revision petition tiled under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, directed against the judgment & order, dated 29.09.2016, passed by the learned Civil Judge(Senior Division), Capital Complex at Yupia, Arunachal Pradesh, in Title Suit No. 19/2015.

3. The petitioner's case, in brief, is that the plaintiff-Respondent No. 1, herein, instituted T.S. No. 19/2015 in the Court of learned Civil Judge. Capital Complex, at Yupia, against the defendant-Respondent No.2, who is his wife, for declaration of right, title and interest over a plot of land measuring an area of 1180 sq. mtrs. along with consequential reliefs.

4. The plaintiff-respondent No. 1 falsely claimed that he purchased the suit land from the present petitioner who is the brother of the defendant-Respondent No.2. However, the present petitioner was neither impleaded as a respondent in the said suit nor produced any document of sale of the land by him. On the other hand, the defendant-Respondent

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top