AJIT BORTH AKUR
Tana Hari – Appellant
Versus
Nabam Takam – Respondent
Ajit Borthakur, J.
Heard Mr. Hage Lampu, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Ninnong Ratan. learned counsel for Respondent No. 1.
2. This is a revision petition tiled under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, directed against the judgment & order, dated 29.09.2016, passed by the learned Civil Judge(Senior Division), Capital Complex at Yupia, Arunachal Pradesh, in Title Suit No. 19/2015.
3. The petitioner's case, in brief, is that the plaintiff-Respondent No. 1, herein, instituted T.S. No. 19/2015 in the Court of learned Civil Judge. Capital Complex, at Yupia, against the defendant-Respondent No.2, who is his wife, for declaration of right, title and interest over a plot of land measuring an area of 1180 sq. mtrs. along with consequential reliefs.
4. The plaintiff-respondent No. 1 falsely claimed that he purchased the suit land from the present petitioner who is the brother of the defendant-Respondent No.2. However, the present petitioner was neither impleaded as a respondent in the said suit nor produced any document of sale of the land by him. On the other hand, the defendant-Respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.