SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Gau) 1041

KALYAN RAI SURANA
United India Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bimal Bhumiz @ Milan Bhumiz – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mrs. RD Mozumdar, Ms. C. Mozumdar, Advs.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

Heard Mrs. RD Mozumdar, the learned counsel for the appellant. None appears on call for the respondents although notice has been duly served. Hence, this matter was heard ex-parte against them.

2. This appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923, is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.10.2010 passed by the learned Commissioner, Workmen’s Compensation, Golaghat in W.C. Case No.12/2010. This appeal was admitted by the order dated 06.01.2011 on the following substantial questions of law:

“1. Whether in view of the specific requirement of Section 3 of the W.C. Act, 1923, that personal injury/death is to be caused to a workmen in the course of employment then only the employer will be liable, the court below can in a perverse manner pass the judgment when there was no relation between the accident and employment of the deceased

2. Whether the court can ignore the documents as exhibited in the case and pass the judgment not based on the evidence on record?”

3. The facts involved in the W.C. Case No.13/2010 is that one Sunu Bhumiz @ Sonu Bhumiz was working in a Mini Truck bearing Registration No.AS-05/6463 and he had gone with some goods to











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top