KALYAN RAI SURANA
United India Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bimal Bhumiz @ Milan Bhumiz – Respondent
Heard Mrs. RD Mozumdar, the learned counsel for the appellant. None appears on call for the respondents although notice has been duly served. Hence, this matter was heard ex-parte against them.
2. This appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923, is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.10.2010 passed by the learned Commissioner, Workmen’s Compensation, Golaghat in W.C. Case No.12/2010. This appeal was admitted by the order dated 06.01.2011 on the following substantial questions of law:
“1. Whether in view of the specific requirement of Section 3 of the W.C. Act, 1923, that personal injury/death is to be caused to a workmen in the course of employment then only the employer will be liable, the court below can in a perverse manner pass the judgment when there was no relation between the accident and employment of the deceased
2. Whether the court can ignore the documents as exhibited in the case and pass the judgment not based on the evidence on record?”
3. The facts involved in the W.C. Case No.13/2010 is that one Sunu Bhumiz @ Sonu Bhumiz was working in a Mini Truck bearing Registration No.AS-05/6463 and he had gone with some goods to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.