Heard Mr. S.P. Roy, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. D.C.C. Phukan, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents No.1 to 4. None appears on call for the other respondents No.5 to 8, despite service of notice.

2. By filing this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 05.12.2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Morigaon in T.S.No.2/2011. By the said order, the said learned court had disallowed a petition bearing No.516/13 filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs under Order XVI Rule 1 CPC for rejecting the prayer of the respondents No.1 to 4 /defendants No.1 to 4 to examine Dealing Assistant, Mayong Revenue Circle as the defendant witness, while by the same order, another Petition No. 621/2013, filed by the Respondents No.1 to 4/Defendants No.1 to 4 under Order XVI Rule 1(3) and Rule 1-A read with Section 151 CPC, praying for allowing them to adduce further witnesses along with original documents being two letters received from Circle Officer, Mayong Revenue Circle as well as other information received in response to their RTI application, was allowed.

3. The petitioners are the pla