SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Gau) 1073

UJJAL BHUYAN, PARAN KUMAR PHUKAN
Mary Jonnam – Appellant
Versus
Gauhati High Court – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. K.N. Choudhury, Mr. D Pangging
For the Respondents: Mr. B.D. Goswami, Mr. U.K. Nair, Mr. A.D. Choudhury

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

Ujjal Bhuyan, J.

Heard Mr. KN Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. D Pangging, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. UK Nair, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Gauhati High Court; Mr. AD Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.6 and BD Goswami, learned Govt. Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh.

2. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks quashing of notification dated 17.05.2013, issued by the Registrar (Admn.)-cum-In-charge, Recruitment Cell, Gauhati High Court to the extent of recommendation of respondent No.6 for appointment to Grade-II of Arunachal Pradesh Judicial Service; quashing of appointment of respondent No.6 to Grade-II of Arunachal Pradesh Judicial Service vide order dated 23.07.2013 and for a direction to respondent No.2 to recommend the name of the petitioner for appointment to Grade-II of Arunachal Pradesh Judicial Service.

3. According to the petitioner, she had obtained her LLB degree from Campus Law Centre under Delhi University in the year 2006 and thereafter enroll






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top