SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Gau) 254

PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA
NASIBA SULTANA HUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
ATUL PATHAK – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S.B. Rahman, Adv.
For the Respondent: Ms. J. Das, Adv.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. S. B. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. S. Sahu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent.

2. In this revision application the order dated 06.08.2013 passed in Title Execution No.3/2011 in the Court of learned Munsiff No.1, Jorhat is put under challenge by the petitioner/Decree Holder. The Decree Holder/petitioner filed Title Suit No.83/1988 against the present Judgment Debtor/respondent as the sole defendant for khas and vacant possession of the suit premises after evicting the Judgment Debtor/respondent along with claim for arrear rent and for compensation etc.

3. The suit premises described in the plaint is reproduced herein below:

"Schedule-A:

Suit Premises:- One Assam Type House bearing Jorhat municipal holding No.199 in ward No.13 of Jorhat town situated on a plot of land covered by dag No.359/1088 of PP No.253 of Block No.5, Jorhat town Mouza within the following boundaries: North-Land and house of Late Harun Rashid South-Land with holding No.206 of ward No.13, Jorhat town. East-Land and house of late Mahiba West-Lane."

4. The said suit was dismissed by the trial court whereafter Title Appeal No.3/1995 was fi


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top