SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Gau) 436

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN, J.
GAUTAM SAHA - Appellant
Versus
RATNA BISWAS @ SAHA - Respondent
Criminal Revision Petition No. 463 of 2009
Decided on : 05-02-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondent:Mr. G.P.Bhowmick, Sr. Advocate.

A divorce wife is entitled to claim maintenance under the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act, as the definition of 'aggrieved person' includes any woman who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the respondent, and the domestic relationship extends to a divorce wife.

Headnote:

Maintenance - Divorce Wife - The court held that a divorce wife is entitled to claim maintenance under the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act, as the definition of 'aggrieved person' includes any woman who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the respondent, and the domestic relationship extends to a divorce wife. The court referred to legal pronouncements and settled that there is no illegality in granting maintenance to a divorce wife under the Act.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a divorce wife, filed a case under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, alleging physical and mental torture by her husband. The trial court directed the husband to pay maintenance, which was affirmed by the appellate court. The husband challenged the legality and validity of the order, arguing that a divorce wife is not entitled to maintenance.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the divorce wife is entitled to claim maintenance under the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act, as the definition of 'aggrieved person' includes any woman who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the respondent, and the domestic relationship extends to a divorce wife. The court referred to legal pronouncements and settled that there is no illegality in granting maintenance to a divorce wife under the Act. The revision petition was dismissed.

Issues: The main issue was whether a divorce wife is entitled to claim maintenance under the Domestic Violence Act, and whether she falls within the purview of an aggrieved person as defined in the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act, particularly the definition of 'aggrieved person' and 'domestic relationship', and relied on legal pronouncements to establish that a divorce wife is entitled to claim maintenance under the Act.

Final Decision: The revision petition was dismissed, affirming the entitlement of a divorce wife to claim maintenance under the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act.

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

1. The present Revision Petition encompasses a limited question as to whether a Divorce Wife is entitled to get relief U/S 20 of the Domestic Violence Act and whether she will be within the purview of aggrieved person, there being no any domestic relation between the parties ?

2. The case being an old one of 2009, special mention was made in the Cause list that no adjournment should be granted to such cases, despite that learned counsel for the petitioner did not turn up for hearing today on repeated call, therefore the matter is taken up for decision on its own merit.

3. Heard the submission of Mr. G. P. Bhowmick, learned counsel for the respondent who has made a submission that law is clear enough on the issued that divorce wife is entitled to get maintenance under the provisions of Divorce Act.

4. Necessary case in brief is that on the application so filed by Smti Ratna Biswas @ Saha U/S 29 of the Protection of Woman from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 the learned Magistrate registered a case No.3143/07. It is the case of the said petitioner that after marriage between the parties as on 3.2.2007 she was not given the respect and honour as a wife and she was tortured both physically and mentally on the ground that she belong to a lower caste and untouchable. After around 3 months of the marriage she was kept in her parental house by her husband and never come back to take her back. There being futile exercise to settle the matter, she filed the aforesaid case before the learned Court. Although her husband resisted the petition by filing written statement that it was his wife herself is guilty of misconduct and she refused to return back to her matrimonial house and he being a poor fellow, only a TV mechanic (under qualified) having lower income of Rs.1000-1200 only is unable to provide maintenance to her.

5. Amidst the said proceeding the marriage between the parties was also resolved by way of mutual Divorce. Learned trial Court after recording evidence finally directed the husband to pay a sum of Rs.1500/- per month from the filing of the petition. The learned appellate Court affirmed the aforesaid judgment but reduced the maintenance from Rs.1800/- to Rs.1500/- per month to be paid by her husband.

6. Challenging the aforesaid finding of both the Forums the present petition has been preferred challenging the legality and validity of the order raising the question as mentioned above.

7. After going through the matters on record as well as the evidence on both the parties it transpires that there is no dispute about marriage between the parties as well as Divorce. Thereafter the petitioner being the husband of said complainant (respondent herein) has raised question that his divorce wife is not entitled to get maintenance as she is not aggrieved person as defined U/S 2 (a) of the Act. As it transpires that both the learned Court in their judgment has dealt with the aforesaid aspect. Section 2 (a) of the Domestic Violence Act runs as follows-

2. Definitions.—

In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,— (a) "aggrieved person" means any woman who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the respondent and who alleges to have been subjected to any act of domestic violence by the respondent;"

As per Section 2 (f) of the Act " domestic relationship" means a relationship between two persons who live or have, at any point of time, lived together in a shared household, when they are related by consanguinity, marriage, or through a relationship in the nature of marriage, adoption or are family members living together as a joint family.

Domestic Violence defines in Section 3 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which reads as follows:

"3. Definition of domestic violence.- For the purpose of this Act, any act, omission or commission of the respondent shall constitute domestic violence in case it-

(a) harms or injuries or endangers the health, safety, life, limb or well-being, whether mental or







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top