HITESH KUMAR SARMA
HANIF ALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
1. This appeal, under Section 374 (2) of the Cr.P.C., is preferred against the judgment and order, dated 17-09-2016, passed by learned Special Judge-cum-Sessions Judge, Darrang, Mangaldai, in Sessions Case No. 81 (DM) of 2014, convicting the accused-appellant, under Section 8 of the Protection of Women from Sexual Offence Act, (in short, POCSO Act) and sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs.15000/-, in default, rigorous imprisonment for 3 months. The accused-appellant was also sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/-, in default, rigorous imprisonment for 3 months, for the offence under Section 354 of the IPC. The sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. I have perused the appeal memo, the impugned judgment and order as well as the record of the learned trial Court including the evidence of the witnesses for both sides.
3. I have heard Mr. W Rahman, learned counsel appearing on behalf of accused-appellant and Mr. B Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.
4. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the victim was sexually assaulted by the accused- appellant in his hou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.