SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Gau) 539

NELSON SAILO
Z. Zohmingthanga – Appellant
Versus
State Of Mizoram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Lalfakawma, Mr. T. Lalzekima ; Ms. Mary L. Khiagte

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

1. This Review Petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking review of the Judgment & Order dated 10.07.2017, passed in WP (C) No. 123/2016.

Mr. Lalfakawma, the learned counsel for the review petitioners at the outset has drawnly attention of this Court to Para 11 in the Judgment & Order dated 10.07.2017. Paragraph 11 may be quoted as below:-

"11. In the result, the writ petition is disposed with a direction to the State respondents to take a decision as to whether the land acquisition proceedings should be initiated and completed in terms of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 or by the Mizoram (Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement) Act, 2016 and its Amendment within a period of 1 (one) month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this Order. The respondent No. 2 i.e., the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Mizoram shall cause necessary process to ensure that the decision is taken by the State Government within a stipulated time as directed. Upon the decision being taken, the respondents shall proceed with the acquisition proceedings and complete the entire exercise within a period of 5 (five) months. It is also made clear that the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top