1. Heard Mr. R. K. Bhatra, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. None appears on call for the respondents No. 1 and 2, i.e. the claimant as well as the owner of the vehicle, despite service of notices.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that pursuant to order dated 25.11.2013, as a part of the award, the appellant had deposited a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- before the learned Commissioner, Workmen’s Compensation, Tezpur, by Cheque No. 822548 dated 12.12.2013, which was duly acknowledged by the Commissioner, Workmen’s Compensation, Tezpur. Therefore, it appears that the respondent No. 1 is fully aware of the proceedings of this appeal. Therefore, in view of the non-appearance of the respondents No. 1 and 2 despite service of notice, the matter is heard ex-parte against them.

3. This appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.04.2012, passed by the learned Commissioner, Workmen’s Compensation, Tezpur, Zone III, in SWC Case No. 14/2011. The said appeal was admitted by this Co