A.M. Bujor Barua, J.

Heard Mr. M. Pertin, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners and also heard Ms. A. Mize, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate appearing for the State respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4, 5.

2. Notice has been served and none appears on behalf of the respondent No. 6, although the office note dated 12.06.2014, shows that Mr. G. Tarak, had entered appearance on behalf of the respondent No. 6 and they had filed their affidavit-in-opposition.

3. Be that as it may be, this Court while passing this order do not propose to pass any adverse order against the respondent No. 6. It is deemed appropriate that the matter can be proceeded in the absence of the learned counsel for the respondent No. 6.

4. The petitioner was allotted a plot of land measuring 500 sq mtr by the order of the Director of Land Management, Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar dated 22.06.2006. It is stated that the approval was granted to 78(seventy eight) other different private individuals in the Capital Complex for a lease for a period of 30(thirty) years subject to the payment of land premium and annual lease rent as fixed by the Government.

5. It is stated that amongst the