SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Gau) 872

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Michael Zothankhuma, J.
Smti Moheswari Hazarika - Appellant
Vs.
State of Assam - Respondent
WP(C) No. 2142 of 2014
Decided On : 12-08-2016

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Y.S. Mannan, S. Gohain
For the Respondent: B.K. Sarma, Mr. C. Baruah

Headnote:

Constitution of India - 1950 - Article 14 - Contract Act - Section 23 - Assam Services Rules, 1969 - Rule 183 – Retirement - Pension - Contract - Thereafter Chairman of Assam State Social Welfare Advisory Board wrote letter stating that State Government in their letter has ordered State Board take over administration all Family Child Welfare Projects in State on behalf of Govt - of Assam with its assets properties and existing workers same terms conditions protection last pay as – Held, Above events and facts shows that if petitioner had been given her pension as per Assam Services Pension Rules there would have been no need for petitioner write letter and she would not have lost out on her pension dues - In view of reasons stated above respondents are directed to immediately release petitioners pension counting whole period her service her date of joining till her date retirement process for payment entire pension and payment should be done by respondents within period of two months from date receipt of certified copy this order - Petition allowed

ORDER :

Michael Zothankhuma, J.

Heard Mr. Y.S. Mannan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.K. Sharma, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department as well as Mr. C Baruah, learned Standing Counsel, Accountant General's Office.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed on 28.12.1974 as Mukhiya Sevika in a Project under the Assam State Social Welfare Advisory Board and she joined he said post on 20.01.1975.

3. Thereafter, the Chairman of the Assam State Social Welfare Advisory Board wrote a letter dated 23.07.1974 stating that the State Government in their letter No. DSW(G)-2/74/107 dated 19.03.1974 has ordered the State Board to take over the administration of all the Family & Child Welfare Projects in the State w.e.f. 01.04.1974 on behalf of the Govt. of Assam with its assets, properties and all existing workers on the same terms and conditions and protection of last pay as on 31.03.1974.

4. The under Secretary to the Government of Assam, T.A. & W.B.C. Department wrote a letter dated 03.01.1976 stating that the State Government had approved the scale of pay to the employees of the Family & Child Welfare project taken over by the State Board on behalf of the State Government w.e.f. 01.04.1974. The said letter also states that the pay scale of the Mukhiya Sevika would be Rs. 200-500 per month. Subsequently, letter dated 29.05.1986 was issued by the Deputy Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Department for Welfare of PT & BC etc, which states that the revised pay scale payable to a Mukhiya Sevika was Rs. 580-1165 per month. Subsequent letter was issued receiving the petitioner's pay scale.

5. The Directorate, Social Welfare & Probation, Assam thereafter issued an Office Order dated 26.07.1988 wherein the petitioner was temporarily appointed in the Borkhetri Family and Child Welfare Project, Nalbari w.e..f 01.10.1987 against the post of Mukhiya Sevika in the pay scale of Rs. 580-1165 per month.

6. The petitioner thereafter retired as Mukhiya Sevika on 30.06.2007.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner having been in service w.e..f 20.01.1975 and as the services of the petitioner had been taken over by the State Government w.e.f. 01.04.1974, as reflected in the letter dated 23.07.1974 issued by the Chairman of the Assam State Social Welfare Advisory Board, the State respondents were to give the petitioner pension by counting her service w.e.f. 20.01.1975. In this respect, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had written a letter dated 06.01.2009 reminding the Director, Social Welfare Department, Assam that she had retired on 30.06.2007 and that even after 1 years, her pension case had not been processed. She had accordingly prayed that necessary action should be taken for sanction of her pension.

8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similarly situated persons have approached this Court and this Court had vide order dated 22.05.2003 passed in WP(C) No. 5227/2011 and order dated 22.08.2007 passed in WP(C) No. 618/2006, directed the respondents to release pension by reckoning the period of service of those persons from the date of their joining of the Assam State Social Welfare Advisory Board.

9. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had also approached this Court vide WP(C) No. 4976/2011 praying for release of pension and the same was disposed off vide order dated 22.05.2012, wherein a direction was issued to the respondents to finalise the petitioner's pension.

10. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequently, the respondents had approached the petitioner and asked her to draw pension only w.e.f. 01.10.1987. The petitioner being in dire need of money, the petitioner agreed to the proposal of the respondents for drawing the pension w.e.f. 01.10.1987 vide letter dated 03.07.2013. Thereafter, the petitioner was given pension in the year 2014 by reckoning her service period from 01.1





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top