SONGKHUPCHUNG SERTO
Tanya Ronya – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent
Songkhupchung Serto, J.
1. Heard Mr. Kali Bogo, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. R.H. Nabam, learned Add. Advocate General assisted by Ms. T. Sering Wangmu, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State respondent No. 1 to 3. Heard also Mr. Ajin Apang, learned senior advocate assisted by Ms. Nani Anju, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the State respondents No. 4. Mr. T.K. Tiwari, learned senior advocate assisted by Mr. Nillam Tazi, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the private respondents No. 5 is also heard. The brief facts and circumstances which led to the filing of this writ petition are as follows:-
That the petitioner was appointed vide Order dated 25.5.2011, issued by the Commissioner (IT, Science & Technology, as Director cum Member Secretary of Arunachal Pradesh) as Director cum Member Secretary of Arunachal Pradesh, State Council for Science & Technology, a (Registered Society under Registration Act, 1860, funded by the Government of India as well as the State Government. Thereafter, the Chief Secretary, Government of Arunachal Pradesh issued an Order No. SC (PF)-192/2007-2008/130-142 dated 01.09.2011, by which the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.