KALYAN RAI SURANA
Parashnath Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Niranjan Ghosh – Respondent
Kalyan Rai Surana, J.
1. Heard Mr. GP. Bhowmik, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. G. Baishya, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. By filing this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 29.01.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Kokrajhar in T.S. No. 2/2013, thereby rejecting petition No. 1065/2015 dated 19.11.2015 filed by the petitioner under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) read with Section 151 CPC for withdrawal of the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit.
2. The learned Senior counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present suit i.e. T.S. No. 2/2013 was filed for declaration and right of easement. It is submitted that in the suit, the reliefs being right of easement, the said right was sought to be exercised in respect of the road and drain mentioned in the plaint which was under the control and management of the Gossaigaon Town Committee. However, due to inadvertence, the Gossaigaon Town Committee was not made party in the said suit. The learned Senior counsel for the petitioner projects that the plaintiff was unaware of the law in that regard and was totally dependi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.