SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Gau) 988

KALYAN RAI SURANA
Siraj Khan – Appellant
Versus
Hari Prasad Agarwal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.N. Sahewalla, Adv., R.R. Das, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Kalyan Rai Surana, J.

Heard Mr. G. N. Sahewalla, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. P. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. A. Ganguly, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

2. By this application under Section 115 CPC, the petitioner has challenged the concrete finding of the learned First Appellate Court, thereby decreeing the suit for eviction and arrear of rent against the petitioner-dependant and thereby reversing the judgment and decree passed by the learned Trial Court in the suit.

3. The respondent herein is the plaintiff in T. S. No. 31/2001. As per the plaint, the respondent had a steel and iron material manufacturing factory under the name and style of M/s Assam Udyog Company, situated at Mancotta Road, Dibrugarh, under Municipal Holding No. 246 of Ward No.16 of Dibrugarh Municipality, Dibrugarh standing on land measuring 8 Bigha 4 Katha 6 Lecha covered by Dag No. 72 (Ka) and 72 (Kha) of PP No. 7 of Rehabari Ward, Dibrugarh Town Mouza Dibrugarh.

4. Due to unavoidable circumstances, the said factory was closed in the year 1997 and the suit premises was kept in locked condition. On 31.03.2001 when the respondent visited the factory prem







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top