A.K.GOSWAMI, AJIT BORTHAKUR
Bipul Ch Rabha – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda – Respondent
A.K. Goswami, J.
Heard Mr. U.C. Rabha, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The respondent Bank accepted a request for grant of loan to the petitioners for the purpose of constructing a residential house and, accordingly, a sanction letter was issued on 09.05.2014 for Rs. 22,00,000/- (Twenty Two Lakhs). The petitioners executed a Memodandum of Entry dated 10.05.2014 by depositing documents pertaining to mortgage of immovable property in favour of the respondent bank.
3. In this writ petition, the petitioners call into question a possession notice dated 09.05.2017.
4. A perusal of the possession notice dated 09.05.2017 goes to show that a demand notice dated 18.01.2017 was issued asking the present petitioners to repay an amount of Rs. 22,03,605.95, as on 31.10.2016, within 60 days from the date of receipt of the said notice together with further interest at the contractual rate plus costs, charges and expenses till date of payment.
5. As the petitioners/the borrowers had failed to repay the amount, the Bank had taken possession of the mortgaged property in exercise of powers conferred under Section 13(4) of Securi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.